- About   -   Contact   -   Links   -   Tools   -   Archive   -   Film -



Friday, March 9, 2012

For the sake of not having to write the same intro a million different ways throughout the rest of time, just know that this column avoids the overly long and sometimes dull process of full film reviews and instead opts to break things down based on what I thought going in, what happened while I was there and what I learned at the end of it all.  Thanks for reading!




The Breakdown - John Carter

The Impression:

This weekend’s John Carter release signifies the arrival of the blockbuster season in old Tinsel Town and with it the hopes that this year’s stock of big, dumb, explosion-heavy films will feature ti a touch more character and intelligence. The presence of Pixar big-shot Andrew Stanton (Wall-E) behind the camera shows promise, but with this being his first trip to the rodeo it could be a bit of a crap-shoot.



The Reality:

I really wanted to love John Carter. I wanted to leave the theater aglow with the discovery of fresh, talented voice in big-budget science fiction. I wanted to head home bubbling over with praise for Taylor Kitsch and Andrew Stanton and a whole new world of fantastic possibility. For what’s it worth I believe that the minds behind John Carter put forth the strongest effort they y muster in crafting a film that melted my sci-fi loving brain in to a gooey puddle, I just don’t think they stuck the landing. John Carter is a satisfying, expansive, world-building flick rooted in the character-driven action beats of the 1980s and when it’s firing on all pistons it’s damn near classic, but when it loses itself in the crush of exposition and story, it feels surprisingly dull. John Carter (Taylor Kitsch), an adventurer and Civil War draft dodger has died, leaving his nephew Edgar Rice Burroughs (Daryl Sabara) in charge of his estate and ... his secret diary. Within that secret diary is the story of a man teleported to a distant world called Barsoom (Mars) and the dense hierarchical social structure it holds. There’s Tharks (four-armed tribal people), Thurns, red Martians, two warring city-states and little old John Carter smack dab in the middle of it all. You’d think that amongst all of this adequately doled out story Stanton and crew would find time for some serious action, but I found the film too heavy on character beats and too scant on the bigger set pieces. Don’t get me wrong John Carter features some doozies (the much publicized ape fight a classic) but just not enough doozies. Perhaps it’s a Stockholm Syndrome thing where I’ve grown so used to action over character that this buffet of story and character seems weak, but where John Carter succeeded in story, it failed in action content. Let it be known thought that Stanton is a skilled live action director, ably expanding upon Burroughs pulpy world while maintaining the cosmo soap opera his fans so fervently love.


The Lesson:

Sometimes I want my big budget action films to be a little bit stupider. Maybe I’m just getting old and mushy in the grey matter.



- -




Unless otherwise expressly stated, all text in this blog and any related pages, including the blog's archives, is licensed by John Laird under a Creative Commons License.