- About   -   Contact   -   Links   -   Tools   -   Archive   -   Film -



Friday, September 16, 2011

For the sake of not having to write the same intro a million different ways throughout the rest of time, just know that this column avoids the overly long and sometimes dull process of full film reviews and instead opts to break things down based on what I thought going in, what happened while I was there and what I learned at the end of it all.  Thanks for reading!




The Breakdown - Straw Dogs

The Impression:

Straw Dogs is not only the greatest home invasion film of all time, but also a top 15 favorite film of all time for yours truly. The idea that the man who brought us ... Tin Cup has decided to take Sam Peckinpah’s masterpiece and remake it is completely and totally unnecessary, if not totally uninspiring.



The Reality:

I came in to this film trying to like it. I thought about watching the Peckinpah-Hoffman original to prime myself for the film, but knew that exposing myself to its genius would only thrust me in to a position of comparison. I wanted to see the new Straw Dogs as a film unto itself. Admittedly I spent most of the film comparing, trying to find similarities and differences between the films, looking to see if the more grotesque aspects of the first film (and jesus there are some rough patches) would cross the gap in to the new film. I really wanted to like this film. James Marsden is an admirable choice for the dorky, uptight David Somner and surprisingly Kate Bosworth works as his movie star wife, both of whom are dragged in to a terrible psychological battle with a psychopathic group of locals. Lurie does a good job of building tension, especially within the relationship, and unlike most remakes, the choices the characters make are built on solid emotional storytelling. Somner is a total coward who lashes out at his wife, and knowingly or not, pushes his wealth in to the faces of those around him. He’s, frankly, a prick in sheep’s clothing and the constant torture he faces at the hand of Charlie's (Alex Skarsgard) group of redneck thugs tears at him. I enjoyed, not loved, the build-up of the film, and creepy scenes were suitably creepy, but, and I never say this about remakes, the emotional build-up was almost too much. There’s only a certain period of time where we can watch the various characters torqued towards explosion before that explosion should happen and Lurie lets the fuse burn a little long. When the violent home invasion finally happens, it’s short and not sweet enough. I found myself invested in the characters and annoyed that the final twenty minutes rushed by, with these characters dropping within minutes of each other. The film’s main fault is it’s need to explain. Hollywood can’t have amorality without deep reasons and all of the flaws of every character or explained wholeheartedly. I missed the unexplained hatred that lived at the heart of Peckinpah’s English bumpkins. Everything has a reason in Straw Dogs 2011 and with that the film misses the point: Peckinpah was trying to tell us that evil lives in all of us and lives there without reason.


The Lesson:

Remake shittier movies.



- Noah Sanders -



Unless otherwise expressly stated, all text in this blog and any related pages, including the blog's archives, is licensed by John Laird under a Creative Commons License.