- About   -   Contact   -   Links   -   Tools   -   Archive   -   Film -



Friday, May 20, 2011

For the sake of not having to write the same intro a million different ways throughout the rest of time, just know that this column avoids the overly long and sometimes dull process of full film reviews and instead opts to break things down based on what I thought going in, what happened while I was there and what I learned at the end of it all.  Thanks for reading!




The Breakdown - Pirates Of The Caribbean: On Stranger Tides

The Impression:


No one wanted a fourth film in this franchise. Honestly, I liked the last two films in the series. Almost loved the idea of a world where all of the myths of the sea existed and were exploited by gold-tooth pirates. Were they immaculately made? No. Were they entertaining? They tried. Do I want a fourth film? Not even a little.


The Reality:

Way to drive your enormous franchise directly on to the beach Disney. Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides is, as everyone expected, a teeth-bared money grab. A film that is so lacking in the soul and inspiration of the preceding movies, you’d imagine George Lucas might have had his hands on it. Gore Verbinski is, sadly, gone, and Rob Marshall has been sticky tacked to the director’s chair and now Johnny Depp is the film’s drunken, comic lead Jack Sparrow. This go around, the treasure is the Fountain of Youth and the villain is Ian McShane’s surprisingly boring Blackbeard. There’s a ''romantic" lead for Sparrow and Geoffrey Rush’s Barbosa is back to hobble around on one leg. I could just keep writing trite summaries of the film, because simple, boring sentences entertain me more than a single moment of this awful film did. The film is lifeless, a collection of comic bits and ideas cobbled together from the first three films, glued together by a certified hack. Jack Sparrow is ostensibly the lead, but there are so many characters running around, that his drunken pirate becomes a gee-whiz comic character, meandering about the sidelines. The great hope of a reinvention of this franchise was that some of the bloated love-handles of the first films would be sliced in to oblivion, but this is not the case. Marshall instead chooses to start his film with an hour and a half of character re-introduction that twists the narrative in to a sizable knot while leaving him a scant forty-five minutes to untangle it. These character reintroductions are slim on actual development, and the movie turns in to a boulder-paced collection of aggravating "chase sequences" and a mermaid massacre. Don’t even get me started on the zombie pirates, mermaid/human love story, and the attempt to make Penelope Cruz a dangerous seawomen.

My biggest complaint about the film: this film is about pirates and three-fourths of its running time finds it sea-legged adventurers traipsing about a jungle. Get your shit together Marshall before you bring your heavy hand to play in ruining The Thin Man for a new generation.


The Lesson:

Blockbusters never change. If they do, they’re not called blockbusters.



- Noah Sanders -



Unless otherwise expressly stated, all text in this blog and any related pages, including the blog's archives, is licensed by John Laird under a Creative Commons License.