- About   -   Contact   -   Links   -   Tools   -   Archive   -   Film -



Friday, January 28, 2011

For the sake of not having to write the same intro a million different ways throughout the rest of time, just know that this column avoids the overly long and sometimes dull process of full film reviews and instead opts to break things down based on what I thought going in, what happened while I was there and what I learned at the end of it all.  Thanks for reading!




The Breakdown - The Rite

The Impression:

I was thinking to myself on the way to see The Rite, "What’s the last good film Anthony Hopkins made?” I thought and thought and thought and thought and all I could come up with was, "It certainly doesn’t seem like The Rite is going to be it."


The Reality:

The scariest moment of Mikael Hafstrom’s new exorcism flick The Rite involves a kitten throwing itself against a window. Not in a scary way either, the kitty-cat just jumps against a window, making a loud thud, and thus sending the audience in to a nervous titter of giggles and sighs. Aside from this one feline scare though The Rite is another eye-lolling modern entry in to the exorcism genre I could certainly have done without. Colin O’Donoghue plays Michael Kovak, a mortician who turns priest to escape the loving-but-controlling hand of his father. Kovak doesn’t really want to be a priest though and when he tries to shy away from taking his vows he’s convinced to ship off to Rome to join a newly formed class devoted to creating exorcists. Yet Kovak’s faith is so thin he becomes bored with this as well and is sent off again to make nice with famed exorcist Father Lucas Trevant (Anthony Hopkins). Demons possess people, exorcisms are attempted, the thin line between Heaven and Hell is sorely tested.

The film, though sold as a both an Anthony Hopkin’s vehicle and a scary movie, rests almost entirely on the discovery of faith by the lax Michael Kovak. Which, sadly is a poor choice, as O’Donoghue is less an actor, and more so a blob of fretting facial emotions and petulant expressions and the film turns the mystery of the exorcism in to the same bland Exorcist rehashes we’ve seen over and over again. How many times can a girl spasm on the ground as if her back is going to break or speak in a grim devil-like man-voice or roll her eyes in religious exultation before the audience realizes it’s just the same old shit? Can someone, anyone, please make an exorcism movie that pushes the genre forward? Mikael Hafstrom, you’re name is not on that short list.


The Lesson:

Exorcism films made in the modern era are to be avoided.



- Noah Sanders -



Unless otherwise expressly stated, all text in this blog and any related pages, including the blog's archives, is licensed by John Laird under a Creative Commons License.