- About   -   Contact   -   Links   -   Tools   -   Archive   -   Film -



Friday, April 15, 2011

For the sake of not having to write the same intro a million different ways throughout the rest of time, just know that this column avoids the overly long and sometimes dull process of full film reviews and instead opts to break things down based on what I thought going in, what happened while I was there and what I learned at the end of it all.  Thanks for reading!




The Breakdown - Scream 4

The Impression:

Who knows? It’s a sort of rock-bottom move by the skin-flints in Hollywood to introduce a fourth picture in the Scream series after the film’s sequel and threequel were so abysmal. Was anybody asking for this? Or is this just a bald faced attempt to mine a new wave of franchise from the recently dormant series?


The Reality:

I’ll say this, Scream 4 isn’t as bad as you think the fourth entry in to a series that peaked at entry one would be. It manages through some borderline obnoxious use of the term "meta" to lambast the horror genres need to expunge sequel after sequel and the inherent weaknesses this sort of diluting of the original seems to bring about. The film, though previews would make you think otherwise, follows Sydney Prescott (Neve Campbell, looking wrenched directly out of Party of Five) as she returns back to Woodboro, the scene of the horrific Ghostface killings ten years prior. She returns as an author of a book about not being a victim, to a sleepy town that still finds infamy in the killings that now define it. Of course, Sydney’s return prompts a new killer to throw on the mask and start hacking people in to bits and pieces. Scream 4 is so dedicated to discussing itself, and thus the horror film, that at times it becomes ludicrous. Character after character after character yammering on about the shittiness of a sequel, or the "new rules" of horror, all the while a new generation of meat falls to the knife. And as annoying as it is, what it does paint an accurate picture of is the sort of stoner-eyed malaise the upcoming generation seems to view the world with. Everything can be seen on the internet and nothing, not even the murder of your closest friends, can shock anymore.

Strangely enough, where most would think Scream 4 is a franchise reigniter, the film heels pretty closely to the original films stars. Sydney Prescott is clearly the main character of the film with David Arquette’s idiotic sheriff Dewey and his nosy reporter wife Gail (Courtney Cox) second leads. The rest of the blank-faced teen starlets are merely fodder for gruesome killing and, honestly, I’m glad. I saw the first Scream film when I was a freshmen in high school, and the thrill of seeing Sydney Prescott kick the shit out of Ghostface still lingers in me. Thus when she kicks him down in the stairs in an early scene, I cheered a little bit. The film drags, almost on purpose it seems, and tries to explain away its narrative holes through meta-contextual reasoning, but Ghostface, even if his voice is sounding a little overthought these days, is still scary, and sure, I can’t recall a single new characters name, but a few of the stabbing deaths certainly resonate. It isn’t Scream, that’s for sure, but it isn’t Scream 3 either.


The Lesson:

Maybe fourth film horror sequels can be decent. Or maybe I just love myself some Sydney Prescott.



- Noah Sanders -



Unless otherwise expressly stated, all text in this blog and any related pages, including the blog's archives, is licensed by John Laird under a Creative Commons License.