- About   -   Contact   -   Links   -   Tools   -   Archive   -   Film -



Friday, November 19, 2010

For the sake of not having to write the same intro a million different ways throughout the rest of time, just know that this column avoids the overly long and sometimes dull process of full film reviews and instead opts to break things down based on what I thought going in, what happened while I was there and what I learned at the end of it all.  Thanks for reading!




The Breakdown - The Next Three Days

The Impression:

I’ve been so unbelievably unimpressed with Paul Haggis’ heavy-handed out put up to this point, I was sure this was going to be another sloppy, emotion drenched mess.


The Reality:

The Next Three Days is a sort of cobbled together collection of movies (the heist film, the prison film, the broken family film, the obsessed man film, etc.) held together by an exceptional performance by Russell Crowe as a man fixated on freeing his wife from prison. Crowe plays John Brennan, a professor at a community college who’s wife (Elizabeth Banks) is imprisoned for a murder he believes she didn’t commit. When she attempts suicide he decides his only choice is to free her from prison. The next two or so hours is a well executed portrayal of a man obsessed. Brennan continues to fuck up his planning and his attempts at freeing his wife, but he just can’t stop. He loses family and friends and the affection of his son, but the chance of breaking his wife out of prison overcomes everything. It’s a slow burn this one, so slow that at times I actually didn’t know if a prison break attempt was actually going to happen, but Crowe’s performance is so dedicated (in the slumpy way he’s so good at) that it keeps you engaged the entire way through.

As every blockbuster seems to these days, the ending really spoils the pot. Not giving anything away, but a crux of Crowe’s character is his undying belief in his wife’s innocence. For this film to succeed entirely for me I would’ve needed that blind spot to never be revealed. But this is Hollywood folks, and audiences don’t like the blurry vagueness of an unanswered questioned. It doesn’t ruin the picture, but it certainly slides it in to the more formulaic muck it sidesteps for so long.


The Lesson:

Maybe Paul Haggis only sucks most of the time.



 

Noah Sanders is the blog/news editor at Light In The Attic and a contributor at Sound On The Sound and the KEXP blog.  He also has his own Criterion-based film site, Criterion Quest.   If you'd like to contact Noah in regards to his writings here at Side One: Track One then please do so here.


- Noah Sanders -




Unless otherwise expressly stated, all text in this blog and any related pages, including the blog's archives, is licensed by John Laird under a Creative Commons License.